Problem 1
Compute \(d(12000)\).
Solution
\(12000=2^5 \cdot 3 \cdot 5^3\), so \(d(12000)=d(2^5)d(3)d(5^3)=6\cdot 2 \cdot 4=48\)
Compute \(d(12000)\).
\(12000=2^5 \cdot 3 \cdot 5^3\), so \(d(12000)=d(2^5)d(3)d(5^3)=6\cdot 2 \cdot 4=48\)
Compute \(\sigma(864)\).
\(864=2^5 \cdot 3^3\), so \(\sigma(864)=\sigma(2^5)\sigma(3^3)\). We have \(\sigma(2^5)=2^6-1=63\) and \(\sigma(3^3)=1+3+9+27=40\). Thus \(\sigma(864)=63 \cdot 40=2520\).
Compute \(\phi(360)\).
Note \(360=2^3 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5\). Now \(\phi(2^3)=2^2(2-1)=4\), \(\phi(3^2)=3^1(3-1)=6\) and \(\phi(5)=5-1=4\). Thus \(\phi(360)=4 \cdot 6 \cdot 4 =96\).
Recall that a pair \((a,b)\) is an amicable pair if the sum of the proper divisors of \(a\) is equal to \(b\) and the sum of the proper divisors of \(b\) is equal to \(a\). Verify \((220, 284)\) is an amicable pair.
Note \(220=2^2 \cdot 5 \cdot 11\) and \(284 = 2^2 \cdot 71\). We have \[\sigma(220)=\sigma(2^2)\sigma(5)\sigma(11)=7 \cdot 6 \cdot 12=504\] and \[\sigma(284)=\sigma(2^2)\sigma(71)=7 \cdot 72=504.\] Thus \(\sigma(220)-220=284\) and \(\sigma(284)-284=220\) as desired.
Determine the least residue of \(13^{17}\) modulo \(60\).
Note that \(13\) is relatively prime to \(60\) and \(\phi(60)=16\). Thus \(13^{16} \equiv 1 \pmod{60}\) by Euler’s theorem. Thus \(13^{17} \equiv 13 \pmod{60}\).
List all the totatives modulo \(24\).
We find \(\{1,5,7,11,13,17,19,23\}\).
Prove that \[\sum_{k=0}^n p^k = \frac{p^{n+1}-1}{p-1}\] for all positive integers \(n\) and primes \(p\).
We proceed by induction on \(n\).
For the basis step \(n=1\) we check: \[\sum_{k=0}^1 p^k = 1+p = \frac{p^{1+1}-1}{p-1}\] as desired.
For the induction step, we assume the equation is true for \(n\) and consider the case of \(n+1\). We compute: \[\begin{align*} &\sum_{k=0}^{n+1} p^k \\ =&\sum_{k=0}^{n} p^k + p^{n+1}\\ =&\frac{p^{n+1}-1}{p-1} + p^{n+1}\\ =&\frac{p^{n+1}-1 + p^{n+2}-p^{n+1}}{p-1}\\ =&\frac{p^{n+2}-1}{p-1} \end{align*}\] as desired.
Alternative solution: Let \(m=\sum_{k=0}^n p^k\). Then \[(p-1)m=\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n+1} p^{k}\right) - \left( \sum_{k=0}^n p^k \right) =p^{n+1}-1\] Since \(p \ne 1\), we divide to obtain \(m=(p^{n+1}-1)/(p-1)\) as desired.
Determine all positive integers \(n\) such that \(\phi(n)\) is prime.
Suppose \(\phi(n)\) is prime. Let \(n=p_1^{k_1}\cdots p_r^{k_r}\) be the prime-power decomposition of \(n\). Then \(\phi(n)=\phi(p_1^{k_1})\cdots \phi(p_r^{k_r})\) is prime. Thus each \(\phi(p^k)\) is either \(1\) or prime for each prime-power.
First, note that \(\phi(p^k)=1\) if and only if \(p^{k-1}(p-1)=1\). This is only possible when \(k=1\) and \(p=2\); in other words, \(p^k=2\).
Now consider the case where \(\phi(p^k)\) is a prime. Thus \(p^{k-1}(p-1)\) is prime. Thus, either \(p^{k-1}=1\) or \(p-1=1\). In the first case, \(k=1\) and \(p-1\) is prime; which is only possible if \(p=3\). In the second case \(p=2\) and \(p^{k-1}\) must be prime; thus \(k=2\). Thus, when \(\phi(p^k)\) is a prime power only when \(p^k=3\) or \(p^k=4\).
Thus, \(\phi(n)\) is a prime when \(n\) is \(3\), \(4\) or \(6\).
Observation: Many students wrote down \(\phi(n)\) for low values of \(n\). This is an excellent idea to see what the answer might be and also why.